900K Companies 6.1M Contacts 3.6M Emails 5.9M LinkedIn Links 5.6M Company Phones 1.1M Direct Phones

Scott’s Directories vs Lusha: How Our Canadian Business Database Compares


900K
Companies
6.1M
Contacts
3.6M
Emails
1.1M
Direct Phones
5.6M
Company Phones
5.9M
LinkedIn Links
knowledge-center

If you are researching B2B contact data tools for a Canadian sales or marketing team, you have likely come across Lusha. If you searched for “Scott’s vs Lusha” or a Lusha alternative in Canada, this page answers that question directly. Lusha is a B2B contact data and sales intelligence platform built around a browser extension and a credit-based database, according to its own website. We built Scott’s Directories differently. We focus specifically on verified Canadian company and executive contact data, priced as a straightforward subscription rather than a credit-based system.

This page lays out how we describe our database, pricing, and features, alongside what Lusha publishes about its platform so that you can compare the two directly. We have tried to keep this page factual rather than promotional. Where we reference Lusha, we rely on what Lusha publishes about itself, along with figures reported by independent third-party reviews, rather than describing its platform in our own terms.

Neither platform is presented here as objectively better than the other. Scott’s Directories and Lusha solve different problems for different kinds of teams, and this guide is meant to help you understand that difference clearly enough to decide which one, or which combination, fits your situation.

In Short: Scott’s Directories is a 100% Canadian-owned and operated business database, focused specifically on verified Canadian companies and executive contacts. Our database includes more than 900,000 companies and 6.1 million executive contacts, compiled and verified quarterly, priced as a subscription in Canadian dollars. Lusha is a B2B contact data platform built around a browser extension and a credit-based pricing model, with a global database and a stated focus on contact-level accuracy. The sections below compare both in more detail.

Why Canadian Teams Look for a Lusha Alternative in Canada

Many of the businesses that reach out to us have already evaluated, or are actively using, a global contact data platform like Lusha. Here is what typically brings them to a Canadian alternative to Lusha instead.

A Global Database Versus a Canada-Specific One

Lusha’s own website describes a large, global business profile database, drawing from contacts and companies across many countries. Our database is built exclusively around Canadian companies and executive contacts, verified quarterly according to our own published figures. Teams researching a Lusha replacement in Canada often need to determine whether a Canada-focused database fits their prospecting needs, compared with a global database that treats Canada as one region among many. A side-by-side Scott’s vs Lusha comparison of each platform’s published scope is one way to make that assessment.

Credit-Based Pricing Versus a Flat Subscription

Lusha’s published pricing model is structured around monthly credit allowances, where revealing an email or phone number consumes a credit from a plan-based allowance, according to third-party reviews of its plans. We price our subscriptions in Canadian dollars as a flat, straightforward subscription, without a credit or per-contact consumption system layered on top. Teams comparing Lusha vs Scott’s Directories pricing are typically weighing a credit-based, consumption-sensitive US dollar model against our flat Canadian dollar subscription.

Classification Aligned with Canadian Industry Standards

Our filtering system, which includes more than 40 data fields, is built around Canadian industry classification using NAICS and SIC codes. Lusha’s own site describes its filtering around job title, seniority, company size, industry, and location, without a stated Canada-specific classification structure. Teams whose prospecting is concentrated in Canada often want to understand how a platform’s classification system aligns with Canadian industry categories specifically, rather than a broader international one.

Considering a Lusha alternative for Canadian leads? Review our products and pricing page to see our current offerings.

Data Privacy and Compliance Considerations

Contact data platforms operate under privacy regulations that vary by jurisdiction, and you should understand this regardless of which platform you choose.

Canadian Privacy Law and Business Contact Data

Canada’s federal privacy framework, along with provincial legislation such as Quebec’s Law 25, governs how business contact data can be collected, stored, and used for outreach. As a Canadian-owned and operated company, we operate directly under these frameworks. We compile and verify our database quarterly as part of our ongoing data management process. However, this verification cycle should be understood as part of how we maintain our data, not as a compliance certification.

Reviewing a Global Provider’s Certifications

Lusha’s website states that the company holds ISO 27701 certification, a privacy information management standard, along with other stated compliance certifications. This is a relevant data point for buyers evaluating a global provider. However, it is worth confirming with Lusha how these certifications apply to Canadian data-handling requirements, since ISO 27701 is an international standard rather than one built specifically around Canadian legislation.

Questions Worth Asking Any Provider

Before committing to a platform, ask how it sources and verifies contact data, how it handles opt-outs and data correction requests, and how it describes its compliance with Canadian privacy legislation.

What We Offer vs What Lusha Offers

Before comparing pricing or features, it helps to look at what each platform actually is.

Lusha: A Browser Extension and Contact Data Platform

According to its website, Lusha combines a searchable contact database with a browser extension that reveals email addresses and phone numbers directly on LinkedIn profiles and other websites. Lusha states it uses AI-powered recommendations to suggest similar contacts based on role, company attributes, and behavioural signals, and the company reports 98 percent email accuracy and 86 percent phone accuracy across its database on its own site. Lusha also offers an enrichment API and integrations with CRM platforms such as Salesforce and HubSpot, and describes newer features around agent-based access to its data through AI assistant integrations.

Scott’s Directories: A Canadian Business Database

We provide a searchable Canadian business database with verified company profiles and executive contacts. Our database includes more than 900,000 Canadian companies, 6.1 million executive contacts, 3.6 million verified email addresses, 5.6 million company phone numbers, 1.1 million direct phone numbers, and 5.9 million LinkedIn profile links. We compile and verify this data quarterly, export it in a CRM ready format, and make it searchable using more than 40 data filters, including industry, company size, revenue range, and geography.

We also offer province-specific directories, including listings for Ontario, along with our national industrial and manufacturers directory, covering sectors that a general contact database does not classify with the same level of Canadian-specific detail. This structure lets a subscriber choose a broad national dataset or a narrower regional, sector-specific one, depending on their prospecting focus.

Not sure which approach fits your prospecting process? Review our Canadian business database for a full list of products.

Comparing Data Coverage for Canadian Leads

Data coverage is usually a central factor for teams comparing us to Lusha, especially those selling primarily within Canada.

How Lusha Describes Its Coverage

Lusha’s website describes a global database spanning a large number of business profiles, with strength that third-party reviews generally describe as concentrated in North American and other English-speaking markets. Independent reviews note that coverage and accuracy can vary by region, industry, and how recently a record was refreshed, since Lusha’s database draws partly from user contributions in addition to its own enrichment process. Some reviews also note a distinction between accuracy, meaning whether a returned contact is correct, and coverage, meaning how often a lookup returns a result at all, with the two figures not always moving together.

How We Describe Our Database

Our database covers Canadian companies specifically, with executive contacts, phone numbers, and email addresses verified and updated on an ongoing basis. We compile and verify records quarterly, and profiles include NAICS and SIC industry codes, company size, and geographic segmentation down to the provincial level. Our filtering system also supports segmentation by job title and role, company type and industry, and specific geographic locations, with the ability to export custom business lists by province.

Building a list that depends on verified Canadian contact data? Compare the data structure we publish against what Lusha describes before choosing a platform.

Our Pricing vs Lusha’s Pricing

Pricing structure is one of the clearest differences between the two platforms.

Here is a summary of how each platform’s pricing is structured, based on what each company publishes or has been reported through third-party sources:

Factor Lusha Scott’s Directories
Pricing model Per seat, tiered, with a credit system for revealing contacts Subscription, priced in Canadian dollars
Free option Free plan with a limited monthly credit allowance Free trial, no credit card required
Currency US dollars Canadian dollars
Data focus Global contact database Canadian business database
Stated verification Not specified in the same terms Quarterly, according to our website

How Lusha’s Pricing Is Structured

Lusha publishes a tiered pricing structure on its site, starting with a free plan that offers a limited number of monthly credits and scaling into paid tiers with higher credit allowances. Third-party reviews note that credits are consumed per contact reveal, meaning costs can scale quickly for teams doing high-volume prospecting, and that higher tiers add team management and bulk export features. Some reviews also distinguish between phone credits and email credits as separate allowances within the same plan, which is worth confirming directly if your prospecting relies heavily on one type of contact detail over the other. Lusha lists exact current pricing and credit allowances on its pricing page.

How We Price Our Subscriptions

We use a subscription model priced in Canadian dollars, outlined on our products and pricing page. We offer a free trial that does not require a credit card and same-day account setup on business days. Saved searches, dynamic lists, and CRM upload capability are included in the base subscription rather than sold as separate add-ons.

Trying to budget for lead generation without a credit-based consumption model? Start a free trial to see our current plans firsthand.

Our Features vs Lusha’s Features

Beyond data and pricing, the two platforms support different core functionality.

Lusha’s Stated Browser Extension and Enrichment Features

According to its website, Lusha’s core workflow runs through a browser extension that reveals contact details while browsing LinkedIn or other websites, alongside a web-based platform for searching its database directly. Lusha also offers an API for enrichment workflows and says the same underlying data is accessible through AI assistants via an integration it describes as MCP compatible.

Our Filtering and Segmentation Features

We built our platform around precise segmentation within the Canadian market. Our filtering supports searches by industry, company size, revenue range, geography, and executive role, letting you build a targeted Canadian list before it ever leaves our platform. We do not include a browser extension or credit-based reveal system. Instead, our data integrates directly into whatever CRM or outreach tool you already use, with saved searches available for recurring campaigns.

Curious whether your team needs a browser extension workflow or a dedicated Canadian business database? Compare our published features against what Lusha describes before deciding.

Support and Onboarding

Each platform provides a different path for getting started.

Lusha’s Self-Serve Access

Lusha’s website describes a free plan accessible through self-serve sign up, with the browser extension available for immediate use after installation. Lusha’s site describes support options as varying by plan tier.

Our Support Model

We provide a dedicated customer service team and free training with every subscription. We offer same-day account setup on business days, and our free trial doesn’t require a credit card. Our reviews are hosted independently, including a 4.8 out of 5 rating on G2 and a 4.9 out of 5 rating on Google, and we’ve supported more than 25,000 businesses. You can also read client testimonials directly on our site.

Want a walkthrough of how our Canadian business database fits into your existing process? Request a free trial to see it firsthand.

How We Keep Our Data Current

Data accuracy tends to decline over time as companies relocate, executives change roles, and contact details go out of date.

Our Quarterly Verification Cycle

We compile and verify our database quarterly, so we review and update company and contact records four times a year rather than leaving them static between larger updates. This cycle applies across our national directory as well as our provincial and sector-specific databases.

A Different Model Than Reveal-Based Verification

Lusha’s model verifies and reveals contact data when a user requests it, according to its website, rather than through a database-wide periodic cycle like the one we describe. Both approaches aim at the same underlying goal, accurate, current contact information, but they reach it differently, and buyers should understand which model fits how their team actually works before choosing between them.

Typical Workflow Patterns Described by Each Provider

Each company’s website also describes, at a general level, how a subscriber typically moves from finding a contact to using it.

The Workflow Lusha Describes

Lusha’s website describes a workflow centred on its browser extension: a user browses LinkedIn or another website, activates the extension, and reveals available contact details directly on the page they are viewing. From there, Lusha describes exporting or pushing that contact into a connected CRM, with its web platform available as an alternative starting point for searching the database directly rather than browsing page by page.

The Workflow We Describe

Our workflow starts within the platform: search using advanced filters, refine results using our data fields, review verified executive contact details, export a customized company list, then push that list into a CRM or outreach tool of your choice. Rather than revealing one contact at a time while browsing, our approach focuses on generating a filtered list upfront, suited to building a defined prospecting campaign rather than an ad hoc, one-contact-at-a-time lookup.

Industries We Serve

Both platforms describe the types of organizations that use them.

Who Uses Scott’s Directories

Our user base includes B2B sales teams building prospect pipelines, marketing agencies executing campaigns, manufacturers sourcing distributors, recruiters identifying decision makers, export companies entering the Canadian market, and investors or analysts conducting industry research. We also maintain a dedicated Canadian manufacturers and exporters directory and provincial directories covering manufacturing and industrial sectors specifically, which supports the kind of sector-focused prospecting that a general-purpose contact database is not built around.

Who Lusha Lists as Its Audience

Lusha’s website and third-party reviews describe its typical customer as sales development representatives, recruiters, and growth-focused teams that need quick access to verified direct dials and business emails, particularly for outbound prospecting workflows centred on a browser extension.

Not sure which pattern applies to your business? Compare your target account list and workflow preferences against what each platform is built to support.

Choosing the Right Fit

Rather than telling you which platform to choose, this section summarizes how each company describes its own intended use.

How Lusha Describes Its Fit

Lusha positions itself for sales, recruiting, and growth teams that want quick contact reveals through a browser extension, with a stated focus on contact-level accuracy and a credit-based model that scales with usage.

How We Describe Our Fit

We position Scott’s Directories for teams focused on the Canadian market, built around quarterly verified data, Canadian dollar pricing, and industry classification aligned with NAICS and SIC standards. If your primary need is verified Canadian company data with predictable subscription pricing rather than a credit-based reveal system, we would encourage you to compare our database directly against Lusha’s platform using the details on this page.

Some organizations use both types of tools together, using Lusha’s browser extension for ad hoc contact reveals while using a dedicated Canadian database like ours for building larger, verified prospecting lists. Whether that combination makes sense depends on your budget, team size, and how your prospecting workflow is structured today. A team doing high-volume, list-based Canadian prospecting may find a flat subscription more predictable to budget than a credit-based model, while a team doing lighter, ad hoc lookups across a broader set of markets may find a browser extension workflow more convenient day to day.

Ready to see how our Canadian business database compares for your specific targeting needs? Start your free trial or contact our team to get started.

Frequently Asked Questions

Lusha publishes a tiered, credit-based pricing model in US dollars, where revealing a contact consumes a credit from a monthly allowance. We publish a subscription model priced in Canadian dollars, with a free trial that does not require a credit card.

No. We focus on a searchable Canadian business database with detailed filtering and CRM ready export, rather than a browser extension for reveals on individual web pages.

Our platform is built specifically around Canadian companies and executive contacts, verified quarterly, which may fit teams focused on Canada more directly than a global database that treats Canada as one region among many.

We compile and verify our database quarterly, with records updated on an ongoing basis.

Yes. Some organizations use a browser extension tool like Lusha for ad hoc contact reveals while using a dedicated Canadian database like ours for building verified, larger-scale prospecting lists.

Yes. We publish directory products for multiple provinces, including Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, British Columbia, and others, alongside our national Canadian Business Directory.

Yes. Our free trial does not require a credit card. Lusha separately describes a free plan with a limited monthly credit allowance on its own site.

Lusha's database is global, and according to its site and third-party reviews, its coverage is generally described as strongest in North American and other English-speaking markets rather than specifically for Canada.

Lusha states on its website that it holds ISO 27701 certification, a privacy information management standard, among other compliance certifications. We operate directly under Canadian federal and provincial privacy legislation.

Author

Lori Meloche

Lori Meloche is the Vice President of Marketing at Scott’s Directories, where she oversees the company’s marketing strategy and brand development with a distinctly strategic approach. Drawing on more than 20 years of experience, Lori blends business acumen, creative vision, and strategic insight to drive organizational growth and innovation. She holds a d... Read More